Skip to content
Heavy Metal Certified
Apply

Coffee — HMTc Standard

Standard

The Heavy Metal Tested & Certified heavy-metal-safety standard for coffee in Beverages, evaluated on dry commodity as sold (green beans, roasted whole beans, ground coffee, coffee pods and capsules assessed on their coffee fill, instant coffee solids), reported on the as-sold article; this is the lot the applicant packages and the auditor samples. 1 of 11 panel analytes publish a numeric limit taken from the strictest applicable government maximum; the remainder are held under mandatory control or a substantiated not-material determination.

UPDATED 2026-08-17
Page snapshot
Analytes limited1 / 11
MethodHMTc Method v2.0 (government-limit-only): the strictest applicable sovereign maximum level for this exact beverage form and analyte in the row's declared native basis, with disclosed read-across where the exact cell is unregulated, a substantiated not-material determination where a species is bounded or is a method artifact, and a control where no defensible sovereign number and no supportable near-neighbour exist. Never occurrence-derived. Ready-to-drink and dry-commodity bases are never mixed and no brewing, dilution or reconstitution factor is invented.
Native basisas-sold
Standard version1.0 (2026-08-17)

How every number on this page is set

Category 5 carries two native bases and the compiler is configured never to mix them. A ready-to-drink beverage is certified in the as-consumed liquid basis at single strength, and a concentrate is assessed as reconstituted to single strength, which is the basis EU 2023/915 and Codex CXS 193 already write into their juice cells and Hong Kong Cap 132V Note 11 writes into its beverage entries. A dry leaf, dry botanical, roasted bean or beverage powder is certified in the as-sold dry-commodity basis, because that is the article the applicant packages and the lot the auditor samples. No brewing, extraction, dilution or reconstitution factor is invented in either direction: the tea-leaf lead maximum level is never applied to a brewed cup, and a ready-to-drink beverage maximum level is never applied to a dry leaf. Where a government instrument writes the product-form split itself, HMTc preserves it rather than collapsing it: Hong Kong Cap 132V sets Tea, Green, Black at 5000 ug/kg as sold against tea beverages made from it at 200 ug/kg as consumed, and coffee beans at 500 ug/kg as sold against coffee beverages at 200 ug/kg as consumed. Two consequences of the method are disclosed rather than engineered away. The rice-based drink row is LOOSER on inorganic arsenic (30 ug/kg, EU 2023/915 section 3.4.1.6) than the juice rows (20 ug/kg, and 10 ug/kg for apple-containing juice), because the EU assessed that exact commodity and set that exact number. And several formulated-beverage rows carry a lead ceiling of 200 ug/kg because Hong Kong Cap 132V is the only credible sovereign that regulates those forms at all, while the flavoured-water row carries 5 ug/kg because the packaged-drinking-water quality standards do reach a product that is water plus flavour. Those spreads are applicability judgements, each recorded on the face of the cell, and only the endogenous Standards Ratchet in Governance Policy section 12 may lower any of them.

Master Limit Table

All values in ppb (µg/kg), as-sold basis. 1 of 11 analytes carry a firm ceiling; the remainder are governed by mandatory control or reflex-speciation screening with no standalone number, itemised in the derivation below. A brand meeting every firm value on a like-for-like basis, and passing every control, qualifies for the mark.

AnalyteTierHMTc limitBinding basis
Lead (Pb)Tier 1500strictest government ML (Hong Kong)
Inorganic arsenic (iAs)Tier 1controlmandatory control — no government ML; screened every lot (see note)
Total arsenic (tAs)Tier 2controlmandatory control — no government ML; screened every lot (see note)
Mercury, total (tHg)Tier 1controlmandatory control — no government ML; screened every lot (see note)
Methylmercury (MeHg)Tier 1n/mnot material — controlled analyte (see note)
Cadmium (Cd)Tier 1controlmandatory control — no government ML; screened every lot (see note)
Hexavalent chromium (Cr-VI)Tier 2controlmandatory control — no government ML; screened every lot (see note)
Nickel (Ni)Tier 2controlmandatory control — no government ML; screened every lot (see note)
Tin (Sn)Tier 2controlmandatory control — no government ML; screened every lot (see note)
Aluminium (Al)Tier 2controlmandatory control — no government ML; screened every lot (see note)
Total chromium (Cr)Tier 2controlmandatory control — no government ML; screened every lot (see note)

Tier 1 (Pb, iAs, Hg, MeHg, Cd) are zero-tolerance toxics with no established safe threshold. Tier 2 (tAs, Cr-VI, Ni, Sn, Al, Cr) carry a 150% transitional allowance under the program’s Status A–E framework.

Derivation — every government’s number, side by side

The full derivation for Coffee. Each row lists every government maximum level in force worldwide, converted to the as-sold basis; the HMTc limit is the strictest of them, and the last column names which sovereign law binds. A blank cell means that government sets no limit for this analyte in this product.

AnalyteHMTcBinds
Lead (Pb)500Hong Kong
Inorganic arsenic (iAs)control&sup4;screened
Total arsenic (tAs)control&sup4;screened
Mercury, total (tHg)control&sup4;screened
Methylmercury (MeHg)n/m³controlled
Cadmium (Cd)control&sup4;screened
Hexavalent chromium (Cr-VI)control&sup4;screened
Nickel (Ni)control&sup4;screened
Tin (Sn)control&sup4;screened
Aluminium (Al)control&sup4;screened
Total chromium (Cr)control&sup4;screened

All values µg/kg (ppb), as-sold basis. ² no government regulates this analyte for this exact product form: the value is a disclosed read-across from the nearest applicable government maximum, and the derivation names the instrument it comes from. It is never taken from occurrence data. After publication the standards ratchet may tighten it, using certified-lot results only. ³ not material in this matrix: controlled by reflex speciation or packaging control, not a standalone number. &sup4; no sovereign maximum exists for this analyte in this product, but a credible exposure pathway does — it is screened on every lot under ALARA against the tightest analogous reference, not assigned an invented number.

Occurrence and derivation rationale

For each analyte on the panel: what the peer-reviewed and survey literature measured in this category, cited one way to the Heavy Metal Index, and the Method v2.0 reasoning behind the certification limit — including, where no government sets a number, why the program sets one anyway. Occurrence figures are literature findings; the derivation is the certifier's.

Lead

15 studies in the corpus measured lead in Coffee (884 samples reported across those studies): Demir 2025, Domagalska 2025, Salaheldin 2025, Pokorskaniewiada 2024, Berego 2023, Biondicfuckar 2023, Guadalupe 2023, Noor 2023 and 7 more.

15 studies · 884 samples in the corpus

HMTc sets 500 ppb (regulatory-alignment): the strictest applicable government maximum level for this product form, adopted under Method v2.0 as the default certification standard. Why lead is limited →

Total arsenic

The corpus holds 6 measurements of total arsenic in Coffee (399 samples reported across those studies), which the determination below is tested against: Demir 2025, Domagalska 2025, Salaheldin 2025, Biondicfuckar 2023, Zergui 2023, Kowalska 2021.

6 studies · 399 samples in the corpus

HMTc sets no standalone total arsenic limit for Coffee. No credible sovereign sets a total-arsenic maximum level for coffee. Regulators write beverage arsenic limits on the inorganic species (EU 2023/915 section 3.4.4 fruit juices at 20 ug/kg and section 3.4.1.6 non-alcoholic rice-based drinks at 30 ug/kg; the US FDA apple-juice action level at 10 ug/kg) and write unspeciated arsenic limits only in the packaged-water and public-water-supply schedules, which are Category 8 instruments. No sovereign writes an inorganic-arsenic cell for coffee either, so both arsenic cells in this row are controls and the escalation rule carries the obligation. Total arsenic is therefore mandatory on every lot as the parent screen and no total-arsenic ceiling is invented. The analyte is controlled by Total arsenic by ICP-MS on every certified lot. Inorganic-arsenic speciation (HPLC-ICP-MS) is reflexed whenever total arsenic exceeds 50 percent of this row's inorganic-arsenic ceiling, or 20 ug/kg where this row publishes no inorganic-arsenic number. Species never substitute for the total: the iAs result does not satisfy the tAs reporting requirement, not a standalone number. Why total arsenic is limited →

The corpus holds 3 measurements of cadmium in Coffee (63 samples reported across those studies), which the determination below is tested against: Zergui 2023, Abraheem 2022, Kowalska 2021.

3 studies · 63 samples in the corpus

HMTc sets no standalone cadmium limit for Coffee. No credible sovereign sets a cadmium maximum level for coffee. No credible sovereign sets a cadmium maximum level for coffee in any form. Hong Kong Cap 132V names the commodity for lead but not for cadmium, and EU 2023/915, Codex CXS 193, FSANZ Schedule 19 and Health Canada set no coffee cell at all. There is no commodity family close enough to supply a defensible read-across without an invented processing factor. No near-neighbour read-across is supportable, so the fail-safe disposition is a control: cadmium testing is mandatory on every certified lot and no ceiling is invented from occurrence data. The analyte is controlled by Cadmium by ICP-MS on every certified lot, reported on the certificate. A result above 10 ug/kg in a ready-to-drink form, or above 100 ug/kg in a dry form, escalates to an ingredient-origin and process-water investigation and is a Standards Ratchet surveillance input under Governance Policy section 12, not a standalone number. Why cadmium is limited →

Cite this standard

Pendergrass, K. “Coffee.” In Heavy Metal Tested & Certified (HMTc) Beverages standard, version 1.0. Institute of Contaminant Standards (ICS), 2026. DOI: registration pending.

The literature baseline for every analyte is maintained independently at the Heavy Metal Index. This certification standard applies those findings; the two are kept editorially separate by design.